Whether there is a government program or none, “balik probinsya” is always felt on Christmas. Main reason, family reunion. After a week or two, they go back to where they earn their living. Obviously, therefore, these are people with money to spare.

To recall, the previous administration launched “Balik Probinsya Program” on May 6, 2020. Well, for good. The transportation cost and pocket money of which were to be shouldered by the government. Clearly, therefore, the trip back home (for good) was for free. The primary objective of which was to decongest the urban areas.

According to then National Housing Authority (NHA) General Manager Marcelino Escalada Jr., in just four days he already saw 10,000 enrollees all over Metro Manila who were willing to go back to their respective provinces and municipalities. Likewise, the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) Region 7 (together with other agencies) gave it a good push and were so encouraged then of the interest the program generated.

Whatever their (beneficiaries) reasons, the fact remains that there is a need to go deeper into the roots of the problem that made them abandon their rural abode. That way, we will be able to address the congestion problems in the highly urbanized areas.

We call this rural exodus. It simply means, farmers, farm workers or fisher folks left their farms or livelihood and tried their luck in highly urbanized areas. The main reason-abject poverty.

Notably, majority of those in dire strait are in the agriculture sector. In fact, if examined closely, those who are mired in poverty in the highly urbanized cities’ slum areas are rural migrants. These are offshoots of the continuing rural exodus on account of the feeling and perception of helplessness in the countryside.

So prevalent for decades now, rural exodus or rural flight refers to migratory patterns that normally happen in a depressed region or province. Due to limited opportunities, there tends to be a movement of people from the rural areas to the urban areas. The search for better lives has always been their common denominator.

In all instances, the advent of modern technology has been the biggest contributor to this phenomenon. News or reports about progressive cities and the better lives of their inhabitants (true or not) can be heard or seen right in theirs or their neighbors’ living rooms. Naturally, the dream to try their luck mounts.

Also, the advancement of communication technology made it easy for these hopefuls to make decisions. Though they have to leave their families for the time being, the portability of their best communication equipment made them more comfortable even if they are far away. They are fully aware that knowing their families’ well-being is just a call away.

Undeniably, the availability of real-time communication benefitted the majority of the country’s population in many ways. However, it has also somehow hastened rural exodus. Consequently, congestion in the urban areas is sickening and inactivity in the countryside is deafening. Worse, both situations have added concerns on criminality in the urban areas and non-productivity in the countryside.

Despite these conveniences though, most rural folks will definitely stay where they are if opportunities to earn are present and reachable. When all the necessities like food, shelter, clothing as well as health and school facilities are available and the opportunities to improve their lives exist, those who have remained in the rural areas will surely forever stay put.

Fortunately, a recent development may just address that. Reportedly, the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Center has teamed up with the Union of Local Authorities in the Philippines (ULAP) to strengthen work with local government units (LGUs) in the “promotion of financially viable infrastructure PPP projects.” Signed last December 19, both agreed “to promote the PPP program to encourage local economic development.” The PPP Center said “it would continue to help LGUs develop and implement bankable projects in the regions.” Additionally, it will “continue to provide assistance to ULAP’s constituent members in building their capacity to develop and implement PPP projects.”

Hopefully, with them staying put comfortably and profitably (due to this initiative), the Balik Probinsya program will be more convincing to the would-be returnees and will gain traction. Otherwise, despite vigorous implementation of the Balik Probinsya program, this will surely fail.

Clearly, therefore, let us first help those who have patiently remained where they are. Let us help them make their well-being doubly better than those who left them. That way, those currently settling down in the urban areas will just return to their roots on their own.